<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scepticalbanter.com &#187; voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scepticalbanter.com/tag/voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scepticalbanter.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>David Cameron is a twonk</title>
		<link>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/david-cameron-is-a-twonk/</link>
		<comments>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/david-cameron-is-a-twonk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uksceptic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ScepticalBanter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stonewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticalbanter.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Susie who wrote the title to this blog in her email subject which contained the link to this video: Now I know the video is a month old, but if the tabloids can resort to pulling up articles from 8 years ago in order to slur Nick Clegg I see no reason why I can&#8217;t bring this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Susie who wrote the title to this blog in her email subject which contained the link to this video:</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dBlDfp85gP8" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
<p>Now I know the video is a month old, but if the tabloids can resort to pulling up <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/19/eu.germany" target="_blank">articles from 8 years ago</a> in order to <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1267921/GENERAL-ELECTION-2010-Nick-Clegg-Nazi-slur-Britain.html" target="_blank">slur Nick Clegg</a> I see no reason why I can&#8217;t bring this up now.</p>
<p>This is really an update to my previous blog post <a href="http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/are-the-tories-homophobic/" target="_blank">Are the Tories Homophobic</a><em> </em>and shows David Cameron responding to his Party&#8217;s voting record on gay rights. This video alongside Cameron&#8217;s rabbit in the headlights look during the previous leaders debate raise doubts that transcend just the usual criticism about Tory policies. </p>
<p>I am starting to have serious doubts about Cameron&#8217;s ability to deal with pressurised situations and questions.  If this is how he responds to a little bit of pressure from a magazine journalist what is he going to be like should he ever get to govern this country?</p>
<p>These are legitimate concerns, unlike the <a href="http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1120-not-even-the-daily-mail-can-defend-conservative-policies" target="_blank">vitriolic criticism</a> we have seen recently of Nick Clegg and The Liberal Democrats in the tabloids which has prompted even <a href="http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2010/04/these-shameful-attacks-on-clegg-will.html" target="_blank">Conservative bloggers</a> to  reel in disgust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/david-cameron-is-a-twonk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why voting is important</title>
		<link>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/why-voting-is-important/</link>
		<comments>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/why-voting-is-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uksceptic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ScepticalBanter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticalbanter.com/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll say sorry now because I am about to have a bit of a rant. I have heard a few times these past few days that voting for the Liberal Democrats is pointless because they will never win anyway, or that one vote doesn&#8217;t make a difference and I am starting to grow a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say sorry now because I am about to have a bit of a rant. I have heard a few times these past few days that voting for the Liberal Democrats is pointless because they will never win anyway, or that one vote doesn&#8217;t make a difference and I am starting to grow a little tired of hearing it.</p>
<p>I disagree fundamentally with the idea that one vote doesn’t count. Of course it fucking counts. The fact that you have a vote at all is what counts not the notion that 1 in a million is irrelevant. You aren’t 1 in a million you are 1 of thousands of other voters. You can’t look at it thinking what difference does one vote make because the question is irrelevant, the more people that vote for a particular party and what they represent the more the other parties will look at that and start to take note. EVEN if you vote for the losing party you have still had your say in the democratic process. It isn’t just about winning it is about putting your mark down as wanting things to be done a certain way and the more people that do that the more whoever is in charge has to listen.</p>
<p>Imagine if you took that attitude with what football team you supported. You don’t go to a Southend (or insert local club here) game and think what difference does it make if I turn up or if I show my support do you? I&#8217;ve never heard a fan say &#8220;Manchester United have millions of fans more what relevance do I have as a Southend supporter? I might as well not bother.&#8221;</p>
<p>Imagine if they did, what would happen? How many clubs would go out of business? What knock on effect that would have to the top teams who would suffer through a lack of competition?</p>
<p>Now imagine no competition in politics, people only voting for who they thought could win or not at all, not who they wanted to win. Imagine one party becoming so strong that there was no reasonable competition. Imagine the abuse of power that would lead to. Imagine the fucked up situation where a government thought it was so powerful that it could just do what the fuck it lies. Because that’s not far off what Labour has had these past few years and look where that got us. Fighting an illegal war and facing a future of David fucking Cameron at the helm. If that isn’t motivation enough to vote I don’t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scepticalbanter.com/2010/04/why-voting-is-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

